I don't understand my gay friends,

Why so many pics of dick?

I don't understand my gay friends, they only post pictures of dicks........ and often even ugly.

Aren't these beautiful faces better?

I have been seeing it every day for 83 years, I am not exaggerating, more than thousands human dicks of all colors, of all shapes, erect or floppy, long and short, straight or crooked, directly or in pics and videos, and I say honestly they do not make any more effect on me, on the contrary, they annoy me.

Really when I was young, 20 years old, and I began to understand that my sexual tastes, in addition to girls, as was natural and as society expected being born male, were also directed to the same sex I started to go to the gym to develop my adolescent body properly, I was ashamed to walk naked in the men's locker room. Still, there were only naked men, with their attributes in evidence, and I, although embarrassed, had no choice but to undress, like them.

Of course, in the early days, embarrassment was also countered by a particular lascivious curiosity, but with habit, even this residual feeling faded. However, a sense of intimacy masked by camaraderie remained. Moreover, I have never been attracted, at least sexually, by older people; I have always and still preferred young people, tweens, vigorous bodies, of a classic beauty, embellished with a certain feminine ambiguity.

Until, much later, I began to have my first homosexual experiences; however, I have never been able and even today I cannot appreciate the simple vision of the male sexual organ, if not correlated with a body, a face, even better if with a real or even apparent personality, as sometimes transpires from works of art or beautiful photographs, which are also works of art.

I tell the truth if, meeting a new gay friend on the Internet, and him, instead of sending me a photo of his face or body, naked or clothed, to excite me or hoping to arouse my interest, sends me a photo of his cock, I delete him immediately.

What I don't understand is why in this platform, which claims to sublimate in a literary sense the simple publication of a photo, albeit intimate, compared to what happens in Facebook, where however publishing a dick is considered worthy of capital punishment, considers the publication of cocks and asses, generally of old fools, deserving of its literary ambition, while, publishing full photos or even just of the faces of handsome guys even minimally dressed, as I did in my three old sites recently deleted, they consider it a violation of their Content Guidelines so serious as to lead, in fact, to the definitive deletion of the sites.

I would like those responsible to take a look at other sites, freely operating, such as, for example, a very popular one that I appreciate and I am subscribed to: "Gayety", where with the embellishment of excellent articles, old and new nude photos are published, in solo or pairs and that in my opinion touch, if not openly violate, these famous and ambiguous Content Lines, subject, unfortunately, to the free interpretation of the S.S. employees (and this abbreviation already reminds me of something I hoped I had forgotten) and that is the Substack Support.

I want to make it clear that the employees do their job, and for that, I don't want to blame them.